2010 Feb. 21: WA Shelton: COMMENTS on biomass plants

2010 Feb. 21: WA Shelton: COMMENTS on biomass plants
 
Mossy Mom
Hiker

Joined: 29 Dec 2006
Posts:
1688 | TRs | Pics

PostSun Feb 21, 2010 6:43 pm  Two biomass plants coming to Shelton now  Reply to topic Reply with quote

http://masoncountydailynews.net/news/1401-simpson-considering-cogenerating-biomass-facility-on-shelton-waterfront

Going to build one just like the one in Tacoma.  The aroma of Tacoma is coming to ONP and ONF!

Biomass Plants Are Not The Solution

By Chris Matera

Special to the Worcester Business Journal

01/04/10

We need to get serious about global warming and energy generation, but wood burning biomass plants are a false solution, which will worsen our problems, not help to solve them.

While the word “biomass” conjures up pleasant images, the promotion of this old caveman incinerator technology as “green” is a colossal “greenwash” by the timber and trash industries attempting to cash in on lucrative public clean energy subsidies.

One can become quite cynical to learn that our “green” energy subsidies are promoting the cutting of forests and burning them in dirty biomass plants instead of promoting the truly clean energy solutions such as solar, geothermal, appropriately scaled and located wind and hydro, and most importantly conservation and efficiency.
A Biomass Reality Check

Contrary to industry claims, biomass energy does not reduce carbon dioxide emissions, it increases them.

Biomass energy produces 50 percent more carbon dioxide per megawatt hour of energy than coal. That is not a typo, and is based on numbers from the proponents’ own reports. Since burning wood is so inefficient, burning living trees is actually worse than burning coal. Biomass burning releases about 3,300 pounds of carbon dioxide per megawatt, while coal releases 2,100 pounds. Gas-fired plants release even less, about 1,300 pounds.

Not only is burning trees worse than coal for carbon dioxide emissions, but it produces similar levels of other pollutants such as carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, volatile organic compounds, sulfur dioxide and particulates. The McNeil biomass plant near Burlington, Vt., touted by biomass proponents, is the number one pollution source in the entire state, emitting 79 classified pollutants, according to planethazard.com.

Massachusetts’ current proposals would build 190 megawatts of biomass energy that would require burning 2.5 million tons of wood each year. This is massive considering that the average total timber harvest in Massachusetts is about 500,000 tons. This means that at a historical logging intensity of 19 tons per acre, 100,000 acres of forest would need to be logged every year in Massachusetts for biomass alone. At this rate, all Western and Central Massachusetts forests could be logged in 16 years. Even our state public forests and parks are targeted for a 1,082 percent increase over historical logging levels to fuel the power plants.

Burning all this forest would only increase Massachusetts power generating capacity 1 percent, yet al- ternative, economic conservation and efficiency measures, which cost a third of new energy, could reduce our energy use by 30 percent.

At this time of ecological and economic crisis, there is no reasonable argument for forcing taxpayers to subsidize new pollution, carbon dioxide emissions, forest devastation, and carbon-based fuels for minimal amounts of power. These policies will worsen air pollution, increase greenhouse gas emissions, deplete forests and drain our public coffers, the exact opposite of what we need to be doing right now.

Biomass energy produces 50 percent more carbon dioxide per megawatt hour of energy than coal.

The start out burning so called "waste wood" and then they burn tires, sewage sludge and anything else they can get their hands on.  There is not enough wood waste to power a $250 million dollar biomass plant.  They are using government subsidies for the this so called green energy that is not remotely green.Ski

Joined: 27 May 2005
Posts:
988 | TRs | Pics
Location: tacoma

  

So apparently they’re burning shredded tires at a couple facilities, and the Tacoma plant is burning old asphalt shingles, but I’m still looking for the plant where they’re burning old sewage sludge.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in UVWXYZ States = UT, VT, VA, WA, WV, WI, WY = Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington State,West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s