2010 March 15: Should Biomass-Fired Power Receive Incentives? RAWSEP View: If particulate levels are as high or higher from biomass burning as from fossil fuel burning, no.

2010 March 15: Should Biomass-Fired Power Receive Incentives? RAWSEP View: If particulate levels are as high or higher from biomass burning as from fossil fuel burning, no.

SustainableBusiness.com News

 

Debate is stirring nationwide over the environmental credibility of biomass-fired power.

Fueling power plants with waste from the lumber industry is technically carbon neutral, but according to a report in the Oregonian, even with the most advanced pollution control devices in place, it releases more carbon dioxide and particulate matter than a comparable-sized coal-fired plant.

As a result, environmentalists in Massachusetts, Oregon and 16 other states are questioning whether biomass should receive the same favorable incentives as other renewable energy sources–especially as power companies are beginning to convert more generating facilities to biomass.

One concern centers on tallying of US carbon dioxide emissions. The story states that carbon-neutral biomass emissions, would not be included in the US total. Such figures would give the appearance of reduced US emissions, although measurements of actualy carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would not be decreased. 

Read the full story at the link below.

 

Website: www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2010/03/burning_wood_for_renewable_pow.html

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s